Skip to main content

Kenneth Arrow Bio

Kenneth Arrow was born August 23, 1921. He got his bachelor's at City College in New York in Mathematics. He then went on to earn his master's in Mathematics from Columbia University. After this he shifted his focus to the study of Economics. He was an assistant professor at the Stanford for Economics and Statistics from 1949 until 1968. He then started working at Harvard as a professor of Economics until his retirement in 1991.

Kenneth Arrow received the Nobel Prize in Economics (Jointly with Sir John Hicks) in 1972 for "pioneering contributions to general equilibrium theory and welfare theory". Arrow also did research into the inefficiency of government price controls, racial economics, and the role of production experience increasing efficiency for a company. His work forms some very important bases for modern economics.

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1972/arrow/biographical/
https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Arrow.html

I did not know who Kenneth Arrow was before I was assigned this alias. Of course, I did know of equilibrium theory as it is the entire point of economics as I have learned it so far. I think that Arrow's work is important to the economics of organizations as equilibrium theory is applicable to most economic situations.

Comments

  1. Professor ArvanSeptember 6, 2019 at 10:55 AM

    As a sidebar, you might be interested to learn that Arrow coined the term "moral hazard" initially in reference to insurance markets. We will use that term a lot in our class, often in terms of labor supply decisions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sept. 20th: Opportunism

Opportunism is defined as taking opportunities that are to your benefit without giving a thought to the ethical issues they may cause. In the workplace, this could be taking more credit than is due on team projects or consistently delegating too much of their own work to others. This can result in a meteoric rise in work rank, but many times the bridges they burn on the way up will not be there to catch them when they need help. Outside of work opportunism can much more easily go unpunished. There are no real long term effects to cutting someone off while driving or taking advantage of a store accidentally pricing its items too low. The only thing stopping most people from these acts is a code of personal ethics. In my life, I have had a multitude of times in which I could have acted opportunistically but did not. One example of this comes from online shopping a few years ago. I was on a boutique-type site that pretty obviously looked like it was not professionally made. There w...
4 comments
Read more

Oct. 4th: Illinibucks Hypothetical

In our Illinibucks thought experiment I believe having a large amount of opportunities to spend them would lead to the best overall experience. The student opportunities on campus that I think would benefit from the ability to jump in line follow: 1. Single class registration I have had problems every semester so far getting into classes necessary for me to complete my academic plan. Most semesters this is only one or two classes. I believe that if there was a way for students to pay with Illinibucks for a single class this could reduce registration stress for many. 2. Dorm room picking Dorms are allocated based off school year then randomly amongst those of the same year. If someone could pay to pick a certain room I believe many would take the opportunity. 3. Mental health services The idea of this frankly disgusts me morally, but I will explain myself. There are two main routes for obtaining mental health through the University. The counseling center has Monday through ...
3 comments
Read more

Nov. 22: Triangular Principal-Agent Model

At my software development internship last Summer that I have written on a few times I participated in a Triangular Principal-Agent relationship. I had a manager, who was the manager of the overall software team, as well as a mentor who was a normal member of the team that was tasked with being in charge of me. I did most of my work with the mentor, and I received tasks from both the mentor and the manager. Most of the time these tasks lined up roughly, in a way that I could complete everything for both of them in the given time. There were a few weeks, though, in which the tasks did not line up well and I did not have enough time to finish them. I think hypothetically it would have made more sense to complete the tasks given by the manager rather than the mentor, as he was the one with the overall vision of where the project was going. In reality, though, I found myself completing the mentor tasks first.    I felt like he was more in tune with my exact role in the project a...
2 comments
Read more